LOTAAS Pulsar Discoveries — 74  (LOFAR pulsar total — 81)

Short table

LOTAAS confirmed discoveries
#PulsarP (ms)DM (pc/cc)Single pulseConfirmationLocalizationDiscovery dateNotes
2019 (1)
74J1958+21105087.7 Oct 30, 2019beam 19Sep 2, 2019First FFA discovery!
2018 (7)
73J0827+531323.1 Dec 7, 2018beam 10Nov 28, 2018MSP binary!
72J1333+0991123.9 Aug 25, 2018beam 23Aug 20, 2018found in 2 adjacent beams
71J1303+3839619.0 Aug 24, 2018beam 37Jul 23, 2018found in 3 adjacent beams
70J1706+3515919.2 Jun 4, 2018
Jun 19, 2018
beam 3
beam 26
May 23, 2018found in 4 adjacent beams and incoherent beam
timing: LF
69J2022+2180373.5 May 6, 2018
[search pipe]
May 26, 2018
beam 9
beam 10
beam 28
May 3, 2018timing: LF
68J0813+2253152.2 Apr 27, 2018
May 5, 2018
[search pipe]
beam 5
beam 5
beam 5
Apr 21, 2018found among many sidelobe detections
of B0823+26; timing: LF
67J1910+5634120.7 Jan 17, 2018beam 9Jan 11, 2018found in 3 adjacent beams; timing: LF
2017 (20)
66J2123+361294108.4 Dec 19, 2017beam 3Dec 16, 2017found in 3 adjacent beams;
timing: LF
65J1953+30127143.6 Dec 19, 2017beam 9Dec 15, 2017found in several beams, very bright;
timing: LF
64J0100+69114563.5 Dec 16, 2017beam 3Dec 5, 2017found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
63J1426+5299525.3 Dec 10, 2017beam 9Oct 5, 2017timing: LF
62J1958+5631158.1 Dec 9, 2017
[search pipe]
Dec 19, 2017
[search pipe]
beam 36
beam 36
beam 22
beam 12
Sep 27, 2017timing: LF
61J0210+58176676.8 Dec 10, 2017
[search pipe]
Dec 17, 2017
beam 1
beam 1
beam 23
Sep 22, 2017timing: LF
60J1017+3045227.3 Dec 10, 2017beam 19Aug 28, 2017found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
59J2034+6650150.7 Dec 9, 2017beam 44Aug 15, 2017found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
58J0107+13119721.6 Aug 16, 2017beam 19Aug 13, 2017timing: LF
57J0249+582353545.7 confirmedconfirmedAug 7, 2017timing: LF
56J1657+32157023.9 Jun 30, 2017beam 9Jun 29, 2017timing: LF
55J1740+3882847.2 Jun 30, 2017
[search pipe]
beam 22
beam 10
Jun 27, 2017timing: LF
54J1638+4076733.3 Jun 30, 2017
[search pipe]
Jul 3, 2017
beam 8
beam 8
beam 13
Jun 24, 2017timing: LF
53J2122+245418.4 Jun 18, 2017beam 30Jun 1, 2017found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
52J0059+80149355.7 Jun 17, 2017
Jul 9, 2017
beam 5
beam 11
May 30, 2017timing: LF
51J1745+12105965.9 Jun 17, 2017
Jun 30, 2017
[search pipe]
beam 6
beam 8
beam 7
May 17, 2017timing: LF
50J1642+12109935.7 Mar 21, 2017 (IS)
May 24, 2017

beam 64
Mar 16, 2017found in extra manual beam;
on Mar 21, 2017 confirmed only in IS beam,
although was also detected in beam9 with
much lower significance;
timing: LF
49J1710+7843237.0 Mar 15, 2017
Mar 21, 2017
Jul 22, 2017
[search pipe]
Jul 28, 2017
beam 23
beam 6
beam 22
beam 10
beam 3
Feb 6, 2017found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
48J1810+0630779.4 Jan 24, 2017beam 3Jan 22, 2017found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
47J1749+5943645.0 Jan 16, 2017beam 1Jan 5, 2017timing: LF
2016 (23)
46J1658+36333.0 Jan 20, 2017beam 8Dec 24, 20161st LOFAR binary!
found in extra manual beam;
timing: LF, JB - no show
45J0454+45138920.8 Jan 16, 2017beam 27Dec 22, 2016timing: LF
44J1957+0096538.3 Jan 10, 2017beam 77Dec 12, 2016timing: LF
43J1624+5865126.4 Jan 9, 2017beam 19Dec 7, 2016timing: LF
42J1655+6277635.3 Jan 21, 2017beam 4Dec 2, 2016timing: LF
41J1916+32113784.2 Jan 10, 2017beam 20Nov 25, 2016timing: LF
40J0421+3290076.9 Jan 16, 2017beam 2Nov 4, 2016S/N for beam 8 is larger in the TA heatmap,
but map was done for 1024-bin profiles and
it picked on the noise spike;
timing: LF
39J2329+4772843.9 Oct 20, 2016beam 5Sep 12, 2016timing: LF
38J1634+23120837.5 Oct 25, 2016beam 22Sep 9, 2016found in two adjacent beams;
timing: LF
37J0121+14138817.8 Jul 14, 2016beam 11Jul 8, 2016found in extra manual beam;
timing: LF
36J1404+11265018.5Jul 6, 2016Jul 14, 2016beam 1Jul 6, 2016Possibly a pulsar reported by Adam
Chandler in his PhD thesis; DM is well off
though;
timing: LF
35J0139+33124821.2Jul 5, 2016Sep 8, 2016beam 61Jul 5, 2016Found only in SP searches
34J1932+53205233.4 Mar 21, 2017beam 40Jun 22, 2016one follow-up non-detection on Jul 16, 2016
33J0742+4360636.1 May 18, 2016beam 22May 17, 2016timing: LF
32J0856+3324223.9 May 18, 2016beam 24
beam 18
May 13, 2016timing: LF
31J0114+6352165.0 May 14, 2016beam 11May 3, 2016timing: LF
30J0518+5191239.3 Mar 25, 2016
[search pipe]
beam 9
[search pipe]
Mar 20, 2016timing: LF
29J0349+23242163.1 Mar 11, 2016
[search pipe]
beam 21
[search pipe]
Mar 8, 2016timing: LF
28J1849+2651974.9 Jan 29, 2016
[Jan 29, 2016, search pipe]
beam 25
[beam 25, search pipe]
Jan 28, 2016timing: LF
27J2051+1255343.4 Jan 27, 2016beam 17Jan 25, 2016timing: LF
26J1340+65139430.0 Jan 20, 2016 (IS)
Jan 24, 2016 (Sterp)
[Jan 24, 2016, Sterp, search pipe]
Jan 27, 2016 (Core)

beam 39 (Sterp)
[beam 39, Sterp, search pipe]
beam 25 (Core)
Jan 18, 2016on Jan 20 confirmed only in IS beam;
timing: LF
25J1235–02359718.8 Jan 20, 2016
May 20, 2017
beam 8
beam 21
Jan 18, 2016found in 2 beams;
timing: LF, JB
24J1225+00228418.5 Jan 20, 2016
May 20, 2017
beam 3
beam 23
Jan 18, 2016timing: LF
2015 (13)
23J1733+6351041.8 Sep 23, 2015beam 24Aug 30, 2015timing: LF, JB - good timer
22J0039+3553653.0 Aug 24, 2015beam 24Aug 18, 2015timing: LF, JB - no show
21J1745+4230537.9 Aug 23, 2015beam 1Aug 17, 2015timing: LF, JB - good timer
20J1715+4654819.8 Aug 23, 2015beam 13Aug 14, 2015timing: LF, JB - no show
19J1726+3482123.9 Aug 23, 2015 (IS)
Oct 12, 2015
Oct 30, 2015 (Sterp)
Nov 5, 2015
beam ?
beam 40
beam 123 (Sterp)
beam 10
Aug 12, 2015two follow-up obs; localized
in beam 40 in the 2nd obs;
judging from Superterp observation
was originally detected in a sidelobe;
final localization on Nov 5, 2015 with
the 4th follow-up observation;
timing: LF, JB?
18J0928+30104521.9 Aug 22, 2015beam 11Aug 10, 2015found in extra manual beam;
timing: LF, JB - no show
17J2053+1711927.0 Jul 18, 2015beam 24Jul 16, 2015found in 3 overlapping manual beams
from different SAPs;
timing: LF, JB - no show
16J0810+37124816.9 Feb 7, 2016 (Sterp)
Mar 12, 2016 (Core)
[search pipe]
beam 1 (Sterp)
beam 24 (Core)
[search pipe]
Jul 15, 2015Nuller; Four follow-up non-detections:
16.07, 31.07, 21.08 (too much RFI,
due to Sun?), 06.11; Finally confirmed
on Feb 7, 2016 with the Superterp,
and better localized with the Core on
Mar 12, 2016;
timing: LF
15J2006+221741130.4 Jul 16, 2015beam 1Jul 14, 2015JB - no show; timing: LF
14J1740+27105835.5 Jun 28, 2015beam 16Jun 24, 2015timing: LF, JB
13J2210+21177646.3 Jun 23, 2015beam 17Jun 15, 2015timing: LF, JB
12J0301+20120719.0Apr 2, 2015Aug 9, 2015 (IS)
Aug 9, 2015 (IS, SP)
Jan 24, 2016 (redetection
in another survey pointing)

Jan 27, 2016
[re-confirmation]
Disc: beam 45
Conf: beam 53?
Conf: beam 1 (IS, SP)
beam 3 [re-confirmation]
Apr 2, 2015Originally thought to be a RRAT;
timing: LF
11J1849+15223377.4Mar 19, 2015Apr 28, 2015Disc: beam 56
Conf: beam 17
Mar 19, 2015RRAT @discovery;
timing: LF, JB
2014 (10)
10J2305+3134146.1 Feb 22, 2015beam 4Dec 9, 2014timing: LF, JB
9J1814+2225362.3 Sep 4, 2014beam 7Sep 1, 2014timing: LF, JB
8J2336–01102919.6 Aug 25, 2014beam 7Aug 22, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
7J2057+21111673.6 Aug 25, 2014beam 27Aug 9, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
6J0305+1186227.8 Aug 13, 2014
Jun 17, 2017
beam 19
beam 54
Aug 9, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
5J0317+13197412.9BEAM15, 23Aug 13, 2014beam 11Aug 9, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
4J1809+17206647.0 Jun 12, 2014beam 21Jun 11, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
3J2350+3150839.1 Jun 6, 2014beam 24May 22, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
2J0935+3396118.4 Mar 7, 2014beam 1Mar 3, 2014JB - no show; timing: LF
1J1529+404766.6 Mar 6, 2014beam 17Feb 26, 2014timing: LF, JB

LOTAAS non-confirmed (yet) candidates
#PulsarP (ms)DM (pc/cc)Single pulseDiscovery dateNotes
8J1011+1829117.7 Aug 20, 2018One follow-up non-detection using Full Core
on Aug 24, 2018
7J1703+0063810.3 Aug 7, 2018One follow-up non-detection using Full Core
on Aug 23, 2018
6J1838+0012798.2 Aug 26, 2017found in two adjacent beams; Three follow-up
non-detections on Dec 9 and 19, 2017 and on
Jan 17, 2018
5J2354+4038720.5Oct 2, 2016Oct 2, 2016RRAT
4J0215+5138418.4Oct 2, 2016Oct 2, 2016RRAT
3J0418+22455.6Jul 5, 2016Jul 5, 2016Found only in SP searches
2J2025+316.313.6 Apr 22, 20161st LOTAAS MSP?
Two follow-up non-detections with the Core
on Apr 27 and May 17; 3rd follow-up on June
24th; 4th follow-up with the Superterp (1-ring)
on May 20th, 2017
1J1342+6512238.7 Jan 22, 2016found in the follow-up observation of the
J1340+65; Two follow-up non-detections
with the Superterp on Jan 27 and Feb 2;
Follow-up on Mar 27, 2017 with the Full Core

LOFAR targeted searches for pulsars
#PulsarP (ms)DM (pc/cc)Single pulseConfirmationLocalizationDiscovery dateNotes
7J1158+62247.8815.0 Jan 7, 2021beam 0Jan 4, 2021TULIPP; LoTSS targeted searches
6J1602+39013.717.2 May 3, 2020beam 0Apr 10, 2020TULIPP; LoTSS targeted searches
5J1049+582272712.3 Aug 19, 2019beam 0Aug 19, 2019TULIPP; LoTSS targeted searches
4J0952-06071.4122.4 Jan 4, 2017beam 5Dec 29, 2016MSP; Fermi searches
3J0652+474.7525.5 Feb 27, 2017beam 3Dec 28, 2016MSP; Fermi searches
2J1552+54362.4222.9 Mar 24, 2016beam 5Mar 20, 20161st LOFAR MSP!, Fermi searches; timing: LF
1J0815+461143411.3Dec 15, 2014Apr 3, 2015beam 1Dec 15, 2014EOR field, Candi-2; timing: LF

LOTAS pilot survey (LOTAAS predecessor)
#PulsarP (ms)DM (pc/cc)Single pulseConfirmationLocalizationDiscovery dateNotes
2J0613+3761919.1 Jan 19, 2013 Jan 14, 2013timing: LF, JB
1J0140+561775101.6 Jan 17, 2013 Jan 14, 2013timing: LF, JB

LOTAAS is the LOFAR Tied-Array All-Sky Survey, an ongoing LOFAR all-Northern-sky survey. LOTAAS uses the 12 HBA sub-stations on the Superterp because these give the highest filling factor of any set of stations in the array and hence the best balance of FoV and raw sensitivity. This compact configuration also completely removes the need to compensate for differential ionospheric phase delays. Each LOTAAS survey pointing (see Figure below) is comprised of three sub-array pointings (i.e. three beams generated at station level). An incoherent array beam is generated for each of these sub-array pointings, and together these cover ∼30 square degrees of sky (towards Zenith) at a sensitivity roughly twice that of our all-sky pilot commissioning survey (Coenen 2013). Within the FoV of each incoherent beam we also form a Nyquist-sampled, hexagonal grid of 61 tied-array beams. Together, this set of 3×61 tied-array beams cover a survey area of ∼10 square degrees at a sensitivity roughly twice that of the ongoing GBNCC survey. Lastly, for each sub-array pointing an additional 12 tied-array pointings are generated and pointed towards any other cataloged pulsars that fall within the incoherent FoV but outside the hexagonal grid of tied-array beams used for surveying. These additional beams provide valuable data on known sources, simultaneous with the survey observations. All together, there are 3×61+3×12+3 = 222 beams per survey pointing. In other words, this is a pulsar and fast transient survey approach unlike any other and a unique stepping stone on the path to surveying with SKA-Low. With a bandwidth of 32 MHz, a spectral resolution of 12 kHz, and a sampling time of 492 μs, LOTAAS generates data at an astounding rate of 35 Gbps (close to the total possible system throughput of the LOFAR CEP2 network). Each 1-hour pointing produces 16 TB of raw data.



Left. A single LOTAAS pointing showing the 3 groups of 61 tied-array beams each (hexagonal clusters of small circles) and the 3 incoherent beams (large circles). For simplicity, the additional 12 manually specified tied-array beams, which are pointed towards known sources in the field, are not shown. Right. Multiple interleaved LOTAAS pointings showing how dense coverage of the sky is achieved.


Sky coverage:


As of May 8, 2016 all 651 LOTAAS pointings in the Pass A are completed (1st sparse coverage). In the Pass B as of March 5, 2018 there are already 650 pointings completed (1 is still left as of Oct 5, 2018). We are almost done with the Pass C, where we already completed 589 pointings with 62 pointings to go as of October 5, 2018. In addition to that to complete the survey there are about ~50 pointings which are needed to be re-observed due to various problems.

LOTAAS complete pointings for Pass A (Hammer projection):

LOTAAS complete pointings for Pass B (Hammer projection):

LOTAAS complete pointings for Pass C (Hammer projection):


LOTAAS minimum theoretical flux:




Minimum theoretical flux of Superterp at DM = 50 and DM = 300 pc/cc, for low (solid lines) and high (dashed lines) Galactic latitudes. This includes a scattering term based on Bhat et al. (2004). The fluxes of known pulsars so far found within the LOTAAS survey (red) and LOTAAS discoveries (blue stars) are also plotted. This shows that we are within a factor of 3 in terms of reaching the theoretical survey sensitivity, and will have to dig deeper into our existing search candidate lists to find the weakest sources.


Publications:


6. Michilli, D. et al. 2018, Single-pulse classifier for the LOFAR Tied-Array All-sky Survey, MNRAS, 480, 3457
5. Tan, C. M. et al. 2018, LOFAR discovery of a 23.5-second radio pulsar, ApJ, accepted
4. Tan, C. M. et al. 2018, Ensemble candidate classification for the LOTAAS pulsar survey, MNRAS, 474, 4571
3. Tan, C. M. et al. 2018, The LOFAR Tied-Array All-Sky Survey for Pulsars and Fast Transients, "Pulsar Astrophysics the Next Fifty Years", IAU Symposium, 337, pp. 9-12
2. Coenen, T. et al. 2014, The LOFAR pilot surveys for pulsars and fast radio transients, A&A, 570, 60
1. Coenen, T. 2013, Searching for pulsars with LOFAR, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam; (Pilot surveys, LPPS and LOTAS)


LOFAR Pulsar Working Group members:


Jason Hessels (co-lead, ASTRON/UvA)
Ben Stappers (co-lead, University of Manchester)
Anya Bilous (RU Nijmegen)
Thijs Coenen (UvA)
Sally Cooper (University of Manchester)
Heino Falcke (RU Nijmegen)
Jean-Mathias Griessmeier (LPC2E/CNRS/Universite d'Orleans)
Tom Hassall (University of Southampton)
Aris Karastergiou (University of Oxford)
Evan Keane (Swinburne University of Technology)
Vlad Kondratiev (ASTRON)
Michael Kramer (MPIfR)
Masaya Kuniyoshi (MPIfR)
Joeri van Leeuwen (ASTRON/UvA)
Aris Noutsos (MPIfR)
Maura Pilia (ASTRON)
Maciej Serylak (University of Oxford)
Charlotte Sobey (ASTRON)
Sander ter Veen (RU Nijmegen)
Joris Verbiest (Universitat Bielefeld)
Patrick Weltevrede (University of Manchester)
Kimon Zagkouris (University of Oxford)


Other pulsar surveys:

Known FRBs:



The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement nr. 337062 (DRAGNET; PI Hessels) and from an NWO Vidi Fellowship (PI Hessels).